[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]

Perhaps the most accurate overview of our intelligence community can
be
achieved by visualizing it as a "nationalized secret society." Our
predecessors, in their struggle against the old order of kings and
princes, had to finance secret societies such as the Illuminati,
Masons,
German Union, etc. out of their own pockets.
At great expense and risk such secret societies were able to
infiltrate
the major governmental and private institutions of the nations that our
noble predecessors targeted for take over by the Money Power. Such
bureaucratic take-overs are expensive and time consuming. They can be
considered complete only when promotions, raises, and advancements are
no
longer based on objective service to the stated organizational
objectives,
but are in the hands of the infiltrating group and its secret goals.
How much easier it is for us, the inheritors of a fully developed
state- capitalist system! By appealing to "national security" we are
able
to finance and erect secret societies of a colossal scope, far beyond
the
wildest dreams of our path breaking predecessors. Besides the benefits
of
public financing reaped by these "nationalized secret societies," we
obtain a decisive advantage from the fact that these our "spook"
operations are sanctioned by law!
Maintaining discipline, loyalty, and secrecy is no longer solely a
matter of propaganda, blackmail, patronage, and intimidation. Although
these remain important tools, especially in emergency cases, ordinary
discipline among initiates (now called agents) can be encouraged by
appealing to patriotism and can be enforced in courts of law by
prosecuting "national security violations."
As massive as our intelligence community has become in itself, we
still
operate strictly on the finance capitalist principle of leverage. Just
as
a rational finance capitalist never owns more stock in a corporation
than
the bare minimum required for control, intelligence operatives are
placed
only in as many key positions as are required to control the target
organizations. Our goal, after all, is agent control of all significant
organizations, not intelligence community member ship for the entire
population.
The organizational pattern of baffling "circles within circles,"
characteristic of classical secret societies, is retained and refined
by
our intelligence community. That "one hand not know what the other is
doing" is essential to the success of our operations. In most cases, we
do
not allow the operatives themselves to know the ultimate, and when
possible, even the short-range objectives of their assignments.
They operate under "covers" that disguise our goals not only from
the
public and target groups, but from the agents themselves. For instance,
many agents operating under "left cover" are led to believe that the
agency, or at least their department, is secretly, but sincerely
motivated
by socialistic ideology. Thus, they assume that the intelligence
agency's
ultimate goal is to guide left-wing groups in "productive" directions,
even though they cannot always see how their own assignment fits into
those assumed goals.
Other "left-cover" agents, those with right-wing predilections, are
encouraged to believe the agency is simply "monitoring" violence prone,
subversive groups in order to protect the public. When such agents are
asked to participate in or even lead radical activity they assume that
the
ultimate objective is to fully infiltrate and destroy the organization
for
the good of the country. This is very seldom the case. We waste little
or
no money protecting the "public" or defending the "nation."
Agents operating under "right-cover" are handled in symmetrical
fashion. Agents with right-wing prejudices are encouraged to believe
the
agency is right-wing. Left-prejudiced agents are asked to operate under
"right- cover" in order to "monitor" dangerous rightist organizations.
Most intelligence agents remain blithely ignorant of the big picture
which
is so clear to us from our spectacular vantage point. Very few have
enough
information or intelligence to reason out how their specific and
sometimes
baffling assignments promote the legislative, judicial, operational and
propaganda needs of our Money Power. Most would never try. They are
paid
too much to think about such things.
Agents with a "gangster-cover" are of two types. First, there is the
sincere gangster that draws his salary from an intelligence agency. He
b
led to believe that the gangland "Godfathers" control the government
agency for their own purposes. Actually, the situation is the opposite.
The agency controls the gangster for other purposes. Second, is the
sincere crime fighter who is led to believe that the agency is at
tempting
to infiltrate and monitor the gangsters as a preliminary step to
destroying organized crime. Such "upstanding" agents commit many crimes
in [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]

  • zanotowane.pl
  • doc.pisz.pl
  • pdf.pisz.pl
  • alwayshope.keep.pl

    •